794, 2012-09-12 10:50:40, EDT, Yes, TKP/JDE, USGS, 896, 2.68, 0.00, 0.30, Fair. 790, 2012-07-02 14:10:45, EDT, Yes, ERF/CJH, USGS, 897, 2.69, 0.00, 0.30. 501, 1976-05-24 09:30, EDT, Yes, GAB, USGS, 1240, 3.19, 0.00, 0.80, Good. 254, 1955-06-30 11:00, EDT, Yes, RES, USGS, 1120, 2.90, 0.09, 1.40, Good. 2018-06-01 tkp、京急川崎駅前に｢アパホテル〈tkp京急川崎駅前〉｣ 6月1日 本日開業 2018-06-01 TKP、アパホテル最大のフランチャイジーに 会議と宿泊の融合を実現し、全国に10棟を達成 ～福岡市2棟、東京都内1棟のホテルについても、アパホテルとの.

Abstract Tactile-kinesthetic-proprioceptive (TKP) input used to facilitate speech motor control is considered an active ingredient within speech motor interventions. Download film magic hour 2015 bluray full movie. Objective metrics identifying skill level differences across speech-language pathologists (S-LP) providing TKP cues are crucial for monitoring treatment delivery fidelity.

The study examined three kinematic measures indicating accuracy and consistency of TKP inputs by 3 S-LPs with varying experience levels (S-LP 1: novice; S-LP 2 and S-LP 3: advanced). Confidence interval measures were used to compare the accuracy of jaw movement amplitudes of the vowel /a/ made by a model participant versus S-LPs giving the TKP input. Generalised Orthogonal Procrustes Analysis (GPA) and cyclic Spatial Temporal Index (cSTI) were used to determine movement consistency. Results revealed passive jaw excursions induced by S-LP 2 and 3 to be not statistically significant from the model participant’s active jaw movements. CSTI values decreased with advanced level of experience (19.28, 12.14, and 9.33 for S-LP 1, S-LP 2, and S-LP 3, respectively).

GPA analyses revealed a similar pattern for S-LPs with more experience demonstrating lower mean RMS values (0.22, 0.03, and 0.11 for S-LP 1, S-LP 2, and S-LP 3, respectively). Findings suggest kinematic measures adapted from the motor control literature can be applied to assess S-LP skill differences in providing TKP cues.